Uranium
Medical
Research
Centre The UMRC is an independent non-profit organization
founded in 1997 to provide objective
and expert scientific and medical research into the effects of
uranium.
Lake
Ontario Waterkeeper
A licensed member of the
New York-based
Waterkeeper Alliance, led
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Energy
Probe
A consumer
and environment research team, active in the fight against nuclear
power, and dedicated to resource conservation, economic efficiency
and effective utility regulation.
PORT
HOPE COMMUNITY
HEALTH CONCERNS COMMITTEE
UPDATED - Sunday May 4, 2008
Approximately
3.5 million cubic metres of radioactive
and heavy metal waste remains within
the boundaries of the Municipality of Port Hope at numerous
sites, awaiting proper long-term storage...To date, however,
there has been no funding available
to the community of Port
Hope for
comprehensiveindependent health studies despite the $260,000,000
to be spent by the Federal Government to manage
this low level waste and develop long term storage options.
April
30, 2008 Health
Canada says UMRC verifies its studies by Joyce Cassin,
Northumberland News The
latest volley in the continuing battle of the Port Hope Community
Health Concerns Committee and Uranium Medical Research Centre
(UMRC) versus Health Canada and the Municipality Port Hope has
been revealed in a letter presented at Port Hope council Tuesday
night. Read
More
The United States Government Has Acknowledged in Law,
Harm from Uranium Exposure to Military Personnel, Atomic Workers
and Community Downwinders
WHY hasnt the Canadian Govenment?
The US. Dept.
of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program
Act and the US Dept. of Justice Radiation Exposure Compensation
Act recognize more than 35 diseases, mostly cancers, as associated
with ionizing radiation exposure. More than $5 billion dollars
has been paid in compensation to nuclear energy workers, military
personnel and community downwinders. Uranium exposure has been
causing harm to people for decades. USA
recognizes 34 illnesses / CANADA recognizes 4
Read more
May 2, 2008
I Miss Rick Austin as Mayor Letter to the Editor, Northumberland
News
Letter to the Editor
There will be no cease-fire on the uranium debate in Port
Hope on my part. I will not stop until the presence and associated
dangers of the radioactive waste under Dr. Powers School are
exposed and those responsible held accountable.
Many of the questions to the Auditor General that Mayor Thompson
referred in her "speech from the throne" last week
deal specifically with Dr. Powers issues. These are
questions that were never answered or not answered truthfully.
Questions to the Auditor General and
the subsequent responses, become part of the public record
and will be used in upcoming legal action
against those responsible.
I submitted a petition to the Auditor General on the inadequacy
of the level of environmental assessment for the cleanup of
Port Hope. Once again, It is our opportunity
to have our questions answered truthfully and to become part
of the public record.
The last petition I submitted to the Auditor General in January
questions the allowable levels of various
radioactive contaminants in Canada. For example: we
assume the allowable level of gamma radiation at the fence-line
of the nuclear reactors is safe for people. So why is the
allowable level of gamma radiation at Camecos fence-line
six times higher than at the nuclear reactors?
I will be submitting another petition to the Auditor General
soon on the foundation and contamination
problems under the UF6 building, the contamination Cameco
hid under the Building 2 (They bricked over the pits containing
radionuclides that are draining to Lake Ontario) and concerns
about Vision 2010.
It is unfortunate that Port Hope businesses are suffering
but that problem goes back to 1975 when the radiation was
discovered in St. Marys School. That was when businesses
started leaving Port Hope. Cobourg and Port Hope had similar
sized manufacturing communities at that time and now Port
Hope has virtually nothing.
It wasnt nuclear activists that caused the problem;
it was the Canadian Government. There should have been full
disclosure of the problem at the time and a course set to
clean up the mess as well as commission the comprehensive
health studies to ascertain the impact on the health of Port
Hope residents. 30 years later, were still waiting.
I didnt think Id ever say this, but I miss Rick
Austin as Mayor of Port Hope. Mr. Austin promised Port Hope
a "pristine" community when the cleanup was completed.
Mayor Thompson has backtracked to the
point where 2 million cubic metres will be left all over Port
Hope. Mayor Thompson and Council have done nothing to get
comprehensive health studies done, which they ALL supported
during the election campaign.
Dont expect a cease-fire Mayor Thompson. Leaving
2 million cubic metres of waste is not a cleanup. Force
the Federal Government to come forward with the money thats
needed. Rick Austin promised a "pristine" town.
Wish you were still Mayor Rick.
Patrick McNamara
Alberta
Health Canada
hypocrisy Letter to the Editor,
Northumberland News
April 29, 2008
To the Editor: The Northumberland News article 'Health Concerns Committee proud
of its work'
(April 25) does not clearly reflect the points I was making regarding
application of the Precautionary Principle to human exposures to uranium
in Port Hope and elsewhere.
The people of
Port Hope and indeed, Canada, should have the benefit of the Precautionary
Principle approach to regulating uranium exposures, the approach which
the federal Minister of Health Tony Clement announced last week is
being applied to the substance bisphenol A. Many people across Canada
and other countries have been pressing this case for years.
The bisphenol
A announcement is being heralded by many as an unusually strong, leadership
position for the Canadian government to take on a toxic substance
and the Minister is quoted as saying it is "better to be safe
than sorry." Read
more
THE PORT HOPE RADIOBIOLOGICAL STUDIES PROJECT
2007